<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NJ Outboards &#187; Fishing Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.njoutboards.com/category/fishingarticles/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.njoutboards.com</link>
	<description>Boating Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Potential new striped bass record</title>
		<link>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=potential-new-striped-bass-record</link>
		<comments>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fishing Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquapatio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boat show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deck boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godfrey pontoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pontoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanpan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steiger craft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweetwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yamaha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njoutboards.com/?p=1811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Folco: Potential new striped bass record By MARC FOLCO Catchin&#8217; Anything? August 12, 2011 12:00 AM ass was caught Aug. 4 by Greg Myerson of North Branford, Conn. while he was drifting live eels around 8 p.m. in Long Island Sound off Westbrook. The fish weighed 81.88 pounds the next morning at Jack&#8217;s Shoreline Bait [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div>
<h1>Marc Folco: Potential new striped bass record</h1>
<div>By MARC FOLCO</div>
<div>Catchin&#8217; Anything?</div>
<div>August 12, 2011 12:00 AM</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<h2><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;">ass was caught Aug. 4 by Greg Myerson of North Branford, Conn. while he was drifting live eels around 8 p.m. in Long Island Sound off Westbrook. The fish weighed 81.88 pounds the next morning at Jack&#8217;s Shoreline Bait and Tackle in Westbrook.</span></h2>
</div>
</div>
<p>Rumors and speculation quickly spread about the catch and the angler, as they often do, because Myerson supposedly went into hiding, but according to the latest news, he was simply ignoring the multitude of calls he was receiving until the catch is officially documented and certified. Myerson is completing the appropriate documents to send to the International Game Fish Association (IGFA) for certification as the new world record striper. After being submitted, the line and leader used to catch the fish must also be tested, the scale on which the fish was weighed must be certified and no certification can be official until at least 60 days from the date of catch.</p>
<p>The current world record for striped bass is 78½ pounds caught off the coast of New Jersey in 1982. That particular fish was estimated at 20—22 years old. The Mass. state record striper is a three-way tie at 73 pounds, one fish from Quicks&#8217;s Hole in 1913, the second from Sow and Pigs off Cuttyhunk in 1967 and the third from Nauset Beach in 1981.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>FAREWELL TO CAPT. LEROY</h2>
<p>Capt. Leroy, an icon on New Bedford Harbor, Buzzards Bay and Vineyard Sound, passed away on Monday at the age of 89. He ran Captain Leroy&#8217;s Fishing Parties out of Popes Island, famous for deep sea fishing trips for scup, tautog, sea bass and fluke. While the boats are now run by Captain Leroy&#8217;s son, Capt. Bryan Faltus, the elder captain remained active in the family business that spanned four generations. Captain Leroy had also served in the U.S. Coast Guard during World War II.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>SACRED HEART HAS A BALL</h2>
<p>The Sacred Heart Nursing Home in New Bedford held its annual fishing trip for residents last week at the Mattapoisett Town Wharf. The fishing was a bit slow, but the residents managed to land at least once scup each with Renee Laflamme catching the first fish, Henry Grace catching the most fish and Robert Ostander catching the most amusing fish — a toadfish. The other residents attending were Rita Genereaux, Michael Gatherall, Domenico Morra and Omer Thibault.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s one of their favorite summer activities — and mine too,&#8221; said Activity Director Annette Avelar Gallant. &#8220;It&#8217;s a summer highlight, and the guys (and lady) are still talking about Robert&#8217;s toadfish.&#8221; Volunteers who also assisted in rigging tackle, casting lines, baiting hooks and unhooking fish, included Annette&#8217;s son, William, and Farell Plank of Freetown.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>SEASON OVER</h2>
<p>MarineFisheries announced that the commercial &#8220;rod and reel&#8221; season for striped bass closed at the end of the day on Wednesday. Fishermen are reminded that August 2011 trip-level reports are due no later than Sept. 15, even if the permit was not fished. Failure to submit these reports for all months of the year in a timely manner may result in the non-renewal of your commercial permit and its endorsements in 2012.</p>
<p>Marc Folco is the outdoor writer for The Standard-Times. Contact him at <a href="mailto:openseason1988@aol.com">openseason1988@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canyons showing signs of life</title>
		<link>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canyons-showing-signs-of-life</link>
		<comments>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fishing Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njoutboards.com/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canyons showing signs of life Published: Tuesday, July 06, 2010, 8:53 PM     Updated: Tuesday, July 06, 2010, 9:33 PM Al Ristori Follow Share this story Story tools The Jenny Lee from Manasquan ran a crew trip to Hudson Canyon Saturday, and trolled two 45-pound yellowfin tuna plus four dolphin up to 30 pounds. Erik Villalobos(11) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<h1>Canyons showing signs of life</h1>
<h5>Published: Tuesday, July 06, 2010,  8:53 PM     Updated: Tuesday,  July 06, 2010,  9:33 PM</h5>
<div><a href="http://connect.nj.com/user/ajristor/index.html"> <img src="http://media.nj.com/design/baseline/img/user_default.png" alt="Al  Ristori" width="40" height="40" /> </a> <a href="http://connect.nj.com/user/ajristor/index.html"> Al Ristori </a><br />
<a onclick="followPopUp(this, 'Al Ristori', '2008');">Follow</a></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Share this story</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>Story tools</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><!-- --></div>
<p>The Jenny Lee from Manasquan ran a crew trip to Hudson Canyon  Saturday, and trolled two 45-pound yellowfin tuna plus four dolphin up  to 30 pounds. Erik Villalobos(11) of Brick got into his first canyon  action, including a shot at a blue marlin that was raised, but didn&#8217;t  hit.</p>
<p>Capt. Lindsey Fuller of June Bug from Beach Haven took a party  including artificial reef developer Bill Figley to Lindenkohl Canyon  where they trolled a 160-pound bigeye tuna before catching small  yellowfins, and then some larger ones.</p>
<div id="EntryStats">
<div><!-- --></div>
<div><!-- --></div>
<div>
<div id="m_comment">
<div>
<div><!-- --></div>
<div><!-- --></div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="m_fb"><a type="box_count" name="fb_share" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nj.com%2Fshore%2Fblogs%2Ffishing%2Findex.ssf%2F2010%2F07%2Fcanyons_showing_signs_of_life.html%23modg_smoref_face&amp;t=Canyons%20showing%20signs%20of%20life%20%7C%20NJ.com&amp;src=sp"></a> <script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div><!-- --></div>
</div>
<div><!-- --></div>
<div><!-- --></div>
</div>
<p>Nick Honachefsky of Normandy Beach joined Dave Migliore on  Blackbeards Revenge to fish Chicken Canyon &#8212; where only bluefish were  found. They moved into the Glory Hole and watched 150-to-200-pound tuna  crashing, but weren&#8217;t able to troll them.</p>
<p>Much further inshore, I joined Dave Lilly of Hazlet today for some  deepwater fluking in Ambrose Channel from his center console out of  Anglers Marine in Sea Bright. Lilly had enjoyed a decent bite of keepers  the two previous days, but Anthony Altobelli of The Tackle Box in  Hazlet and I couldn&#8217;t provide much help today. It was just a slow pick  in a strong current, though we ended up with enough fillets from fluke  up to 4 pounds  &#8211;  but not the doormat that Lilly was looking for.</p>
<p>Jack Gilligan of Sea Gills from Snipe Boat Club in Carlstadt did find  the fluke he was looking for Monday as he drifted off Hoffman&#8217;s Island.  He boated an 8.3-pounder, only to be upstaged by his cousin Larry who  hooked a 10.3-pound doormat. They also caught a 5-pounder and over 60  shorts, though many of them were over 18 inches &#8211; not big enough in  N.Y. waters where the minimum is 21 inches.</p>
<p>The Sea Devil from Point Pleasant had slower bluefishing Monday, but  choppers up to 13 pounds were boated.</p>
<p>Capt. John Koegler of the Starfish from Beach Haven had good fishing  for sea bass at Little Egg Inlet on Monday, when he was shocked to see a  21 1/2-inch cod caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Assembly Votes to keep saltwater fishing free</title>
		<link>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nj-assembly-votes-to-keep-saltwater-fishing-free</link>
		<comments>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fishing Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njoutboards.com/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NJ ASSEMBLY VOTES TO KEEP SALTWATER FISHING FREE! RFA-NJ Applauds Passage of Free Saltwater Registry Legislation March 22, 2010 &#8211;  With nine months to go before New Jersey&#8216;s saltwater anglers could be forced into paying for a federal saltwater registry program, the state&#8217;s full Assembly today approved a bill (A823) to create a free, state-run [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">NJ ASSEMBLY VOTES TO KEEP SALTWATER FISHING FREE!<br />
RFA-NJ Applauds Passage of Free Saltwater Registry Legislation<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">March 22, 2010</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> &#8211;  With nine months to go before </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">&#8216;s saltwater anglers could<br />
be forced into paying for a federal saltwater registry program, the  state&#8217;s full<br />
Assembly today approved a bill (A823) to create a free, state-run saltwater angler<br />
registry in </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">.  The vote by the New Jersey Assembly (54 in favor, 16 opposed,<br />
6 abstain) clears the way for Senate discussion regarding the companion  bill (S1122),<br />
which if also passed and signed by the governor would exempt all  recreational anglers<br />
who fish in </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> coastal waters from having to pay NOAA to store their name<br />
and contact information on file.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">Primary sponsors of A823 include Assemblymen Nelson Albano and Matt  Milam, (D-District<br />
1), along with representatives John Amodeo (R-District 2) and Celeste  Riley (D-District<br />
3), while co-sponsors include Assemblyman Scott T. Rumana (R-District  40) and Assemblyman<br />
Gilbert &#8220;Whip&#8221; <span style="font-family: Arial;">Wilson</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> (D-District 5).  The Assembly bill which passed today matches<br />
an identical Senate bill (S 1122) which was reintroduced last month by  Senator Jeff<br />
Van Drew (D-1) and would require the Department of Environmental  Protection to establish<br />
a free recreational saltwater registry in </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">.  The legislation would meet<br />
new federal requirements mandating that the contact information of  individuals who<br />
engage in recreational fishing within state coastal waters be collected  in a state<br />
registry database.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">As mandated by the Magnuson Stevens Act, federal surveyors who keep  track of recreational<br />
fish harvest will be required to use the new saltwater angler registry  to contact<br />
fishermen about their fishing habits. As of 2010, most anglers fishing  in <span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
coastal waters are required to register with the federal government in  an effort<br />
to improve data collection (visit <a href="http://www.countmyfish.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">www.countmyfish.noaa.gov</a> for details).  As of<br />
2011, NOAA has said they may begin charging anglers up to $25 apiece to register<br />
online with the federal system, unless states come up with their own  system of gathering<br />
angler information.  Both A823 and S1122 have been written specifically  to allow<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> to apply for &#8220;exempted state designation from the federal registration<br />
requirements,&#8221; while also stating that the DEP shall not charge a fee  for the required<br />
registration program.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">&#8220;This is the right thing to for the coastal anglers who fish in <span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">, both<br />
state residents and for those out-of-state fishermen who visit the </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">Shore</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
every year,&#8221; said Capt. Adam Nowalsky, Chairman of the Recreational Fishing Alliance&#8217;s<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> chapter (RFA-NJ).  Earlier this month, Nowalsky and other RFA representatives<br />
testified before the New Jersey Assembly Agriculture and Natural  Resources Committee<br />
in favor of A823, where the bill passed unanimously out of committee.   RFA argued<br />
that the need for a federally mandated saltwater registry in the state  was essentially<br />
co-opted by advocates of a saltwater license, which is purely a funding  debate.<br />
&#8220;What has happened is people have seen the issue with regard to funding here in<br />
the state of </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> specifically with fisheries and the two issues are being<br />
mixed together,&#8221; Nowalsky told the committee back on March 9.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">&#8220;Sen. Van Drew said it best when testifying for this bill in committee, that fathers<br />
and sons, brothers and sisters, friends and family should all be able to  wet a line<br />
without worrying about lining someone&#8217;s pockets,&#8221; Nowalsky added.  &#8221;We look forward<br />
to continuing to work on this, getting additional sponsors for S1122,  and getting<br />
the Senate companion bill before Committee and up for a vote.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">The last time the Senate version of the free saltwater registry was due  to be heard<br />
in the Senate Environment Committee was back on <span style="font-family: Arial;">December 3, 2009</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">.  According to<br />
the RFA, the bill had the votes needed to pass along to the Senate for  full vote,<br />
however, Committee Chairman Bob Smith (D-Piscataway) refused to allow  the bill to<br />
be heard, to the exclusion of the recreational fishing community in </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Jersey</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">.<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re not pleased with the way Chairman Smith handled this back in December,&#8221;<br />
said Jim Donofrio, the RFA&#8217;s Executive Director.  &#8221;All his committee members expressed<br />
a positive view of the bill, but the Chairman felt it was better to help  his friends<br />
at the DEP instead of listening to the will of the people through their committee<br />
members.&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">As reported in the Atlantic City Press, Smith refused to allow public  comment on<br />
the free registry legislation and instead yielded the floor and his support to<br />
the DEP position in favor of a $15 to $30 fee that saltwater anglers  would have<br />
to pay before being allowed to fish.  Donofrio said it&#8217;s regrettable  that the need<br />
for a simple phonebook of saltwater anglers has been intentionally  manipulated by<br />
advocates for a saltwater usage fee.  &#8221;In a down economy where state bureaucracies<br />
have been caught misappropriating millions of dollars away from  so-called dedicated<br />
accounts, it&#8217;s hard to believe that there are some in our own  recreational community<br />
who would attempt to intentionally mislead our state legislators about  the registry<br />
requirements.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">Donofrio said today&#8217;s Assembly vote is a strong indication that  legislators in New<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Jersey</span> <span style="font-family: Arial;"> have been  able to see through the rhetoric.  &#8221;The RFA is thankful for the<br />
efforts of those Assembly and Senate sponsors for keeping the  discussions focused<br />
on the rights of our fishing community, and we&#8217;d especially like to  thank the Assembly<br />
Speaker Ms. Sheila Oliver for recognizing the importance of this  legislation and<br />
for putting the free registry bill up for a full Assembly vote as  quickly as she<br />
did,&#8221; Donofrio said.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey&#8217;s New Saltwater Fishing Registry Misconceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-jerseys-new-saltwater-fishing-registry-misconceptions</link>
		<comments>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fishing Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njoutboardsstore.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saltwater Fishing Registry in NJ &#8211; A Few Thoughts Written by Jim Hutchinson Thursday, 10 December 2009 Just wanted to clear up a few misconceptions about saltwater licenses and the saltwater registry legislation that was pulled out of Senate last week (but will no doubt reappear again in early 2010).  Folks had been emailing me, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.njoutboards.com%2Ffishingarticles%2Fpostname%25&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%">Saltwater Fishing Registry in NJ &#8211; A Few Thoughts</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="70%" align="left" valign="top">Written by Jim Hutchinson</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top">Thursday, 10 December 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top">Just wanted to clear up a few misconceptions about saltwater licenses and the saltwater registry legislation that was pulled out of Senate last week (but will no doubt reappear again in early 2010).  Folks had been emailing me, and thought I&#8217;d drop in and post a few thoughts from the Recreational Fishing Alliance.</p>
<p><img title="saltwater_fishing_licence.jpeg" src="http://njsaltwaterfisherman.com/images/stories/saltwater_fishing_licence.jpeg" alt="saltwater_fishing_licence.jpeg" width="94" height="126" /><strong>“IF NEW JERSEY DOESN’T GET A LICENSE, THE FED WILL MANDATE ONE”</strong><br />
The federal government does not require states to implement a saltwater license.  The Magnuson-Stevens Act &#8211; the law which governs the management of our federal fisheries &#8211; was recently reauthorized and includes a new mandate that a phonebook of saltwater anglers to be created in every coastal state; it does not require states to implement a license for funding purposes.  This new amendment was included as effort to improve the quality of information generated by the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS), which is the “fatally flawed” (according to the National Research Council) survey system that federal regulators now use to determine how many fish are harvested by recreational anglers during a single saltwater fishing season.</p>
<p>Currently, MRSS uses coastal phone books as a data source for contacting households at random to conduct harvest surveys on recreational harvest, a grossly inefficient method of data collection.  MSA requires that a national saltwater registry of anglers be created, with name and contact information stored in a database for each coastal state in America.  Such a program will provide surveyors with the contact information of actual saltwater anglers, and in theory should help improve the harvest information.</p>
<p>A new federal data collection system is currently being devised in conjunction with this coastal registry initiative called the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP), which will utilize the names and numbers of saltwater anglers fishing within each coastal state.  Similar to the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program (HIP) which provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service with a national registry of duck hunters for select harvest surveys, a similar Fisherman Identification Network (FIN) would provide marine surveyors access to the phone numbers of actual saltwater anglers for actively collecting recreational harvest information. Learn more about the HIP at <a href="http://www.fws.gov/hip" target="_blank">www.fws.gov/hip</a>.<br />
Online and telephone registration for the new federal registry will begin January 1, 2010. Register online for free at <a href="http://www.countmyfish.noaa.gov/" target="_blank">www.countmyfish.noaa.gov</a> or call toll free 888-674-7411.  As of 2011, the federal government may impose a charge for registration, which is expected to range from $15 to $25 per angler. It should be noted that the federal government’s registry was supposed to have been in place as of January 1, 2009 in order to improve the effectiveness of reporting in MRFSS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joinrfa.org/" target="_blank"><br />
</a><strong>“BUT WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM FOR A FREE REGISTRY?”</strong><br />
According to the American Sportfishing Association which lobbied to include a fee for the federal registry in the Magnuson Stevens Act starting in 2011, New Jersey ranked 5th among coastal states in 2006 in terms of retail sales in saltwater fishing.  Anglers here spent over $643 million in 2006 on tackle alone, contributing more than $68 million in state and local tax revenues.  Another $92 million was raised in federal tax revenues.  Out of the $68 million in state and local taxes, our governor allocates a paltry $1.5 or $1.8 out of the general fund for marine fisheries.  Allocating a few more dollars into a successful profit model is called smart investing, you’d think a Goldman Sachs veteran would understand that relationship.<a href="http://www.asafishing.org/statistics/saleco_trends/2006sr_salt_sales.html" target="_blank">http://www.asafishing.org/statistics/saleco_trends/2006sr_salt_sales.html</a></p>
<p><strong>“LOOK AT THE STATES THAT HAVE A LICENSE, THEY’RE IN GREAT SHAPE!”</strong><br />
Federal delays in implementing the registry components of the new harvest collection system are causing considerable data collection issues up and down the coast with resulting closures on sea bass, amberjack and red snapper.  Ironically, even with a saltwater license in place in states like North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, the federal fisheries service has still mandated these stifling closures on recreational anglers, from black sea bass to red snapper and amberjack.<br />
Anglers should remember that our coastal fisheries are managed by federal and interstate councils, and states have no authority to supersede federal allocations of migratory coastal fisheries, even with an expensive saltwater license.  While I can appreciate some folks belief that a freshwater and hunting licenses in New Jersey are cool, the fact is that freshwater fishermen don’t have to share largemouth quotas with commercial draggers, and there aren’t trap lines running across the Flat Brook.</p>
<p>In California as another example, sportfishing supports more than 40,000 jobs and roughly $2 billion in sales annually for sport-fishing equipment alone, according to the Sportfishing Association of California.  California charges residents $41 a year to sportfish in marine waters, and hunting and fishing licenses combined generate about $72 million annually for Fish &amp; Game activities, supporting salaries of 200 or so officers to cover 1,100 miles of coastline.  Because the state can’t afford to pay enforcement officers any longer, a new voluntary $5 tag has been implemented to help pay for salaries.<br />
<a href="http://www.presstelegram.com/business/ci_13941758" target="_blank">http://www.presstelegram.com/business/ci_13941758</a></p>
<p><strong>“BUT AREN’T THOSE LICENSE MONIES DEDICATED?”</strong><br />
Sure, they’re dedicated to conservation.  And conservation includes officers, secretaries, accountants, managers, desks, chairs, cars, boats, pens, lunches, gas and tolls, scotch tape, you name it.  I know that the hard-working folks in the Division of Fish and Wildlife have been on the short end of the stick for years because of bureaucratic indifference from the top – but it’s time for this state to reinvest in our marine resources without shuffling the bill off to the sporting community (see what happened in California for example, where angling participation is off 30% in the past 10 years of a saltwater license).  The question remains, are these funds really dedicated?  In New York, after implementing a first-ever saltwater fishing license, the powers-that-be in Albany chose to offload departmental salaries out of the state’s general fund and place them directly into the marine dedicated account.  That means essentially that the new saltwater license starts $2 million in the hole as license monies must first pay off salaries before paying a benefit to the resource.  A new lifetime saltwater license ($150) won’t be dedicated into the marine account either, but will be used for the general conservation fund which also pays for upland and freshwater projects.  Certainly not a violation of any laws, but is this truly dedicated?  Some legislators in New York say no! <a href="http://www.bignews.biz/?id=823372&amp;keys=Senator-Charles-Schumer-Anglers" target="_blank">http://www.bignews.biz/?id=823372&amp;keys=Senator-Charles-Schumer-Anglers</a></p>
<p>Finally gents, while a saltwater license in a utopian society might be able to improve access and pay for parks and dredging and enforcement and division salaries, will it really help us get more access to fish?  North Carolina has a saltwater license – their sea bass fishery is still closed.  Florida is often cited as a license example – their red snapper and amberjack fisheries are still closed.  NO matter what could do with more money at the state level, we’re still at the whim of what seems to me to be a Pew controlled NOAA fisheries who is hell bent on closing fisheries and denying access for recreational anglers.</p>
<p>While I appreciate the work done by enforcement officers in this state, they’re also monitoring commercial harvesters (shellfish and finfish) while locking up poachers too.  I feel a strong need to dedicate money to addressing these issues, same as you – but are you really willing to foot the whole bill for this without any control over or oversight in how the money is spent, knowing full well that the federal government and inter-state agencies still have the final say in the management of our coastal fisheries</p>
<p>Visit the marine enforcement site and you’ll see our marine division needs assistance for enforcement, that’s for sure.  Hopefully, our new administration will embrace this need and release a few million dollars extra in monies owed to our marine resources.<br />
<a href="http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/lawhome.htm" target="_blank">http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/lawhome.htm</a></p>
<p>RFA supports Senator Van Drew&#8217;s efforts, as well as those by Assembly reps Albano and Milam, for working so hard to try to legislate a saltwater registry in New Jersey to (A) count up the number of saltwater anglers, (B) comply with the federal law, (C) begin coordinating efforts in order to get better data, and (D) recognize that sportsmen are voters and shouldn&#8217;t be burdened with yet another bloated user fee.</p>
<p>By the way folks, thanks for all your support of RFA and especially the RFA Legal Defense Fund!<br />
Your Can Read More Here and Comment on the <a href="http://njsaltwaterfisherman.com/forums/index.php?topic=14859.0" target="_blank">NJ Saltwater Fishing Registry</a></p>
<p>Jim Hutchinson<br />
<a href="http://www.joinrfa.org/" target="_blank">www.joinrfa.org</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.njoutboards.com/fishingarticles/postname%/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

